NRI-BUILDTECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
CW/3425/2022 · 2025-05-21
Avneesh Jhingan, Mukesh Rajpurohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8219 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8219 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21406-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3425/2022 Nri-Buildtech (India) Private Limited, Having Address Main Road Chopanki Near Power House, Vill - Bilhedi Bhiwadi, Alwar 301019, Rajasthan, India Through Its Director Anwar Khan S/o Ayub Khan, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Vill- Khijarpur, Po- Bhiwadi Tehsil Tijara, Distt - Alwar Rajasthan 301019 Having Pin Aaecn3080A ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre Income Tax Department Ministry Of Finance Room Number 401 2Nd Floor Near Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium Delhi - 110003
2. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Alwar, Rajasthan. Having Office At Aaykar Bhawan, Moti Doongri, Alwar 301001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Siddharth Ranka, Adv. with Mr. Rohan Chatter, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Anuroop Singhi, Adv. with Mr. N.S. Bhati & Mr. Aditya Khandelwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order 21/05/2025
1. This petition is filed challenging the assessment order dated
30.06.2021.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length is not pressing this petition with liberty to avail remedy of appeal.
[2025:RJ-JP:21406-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-3425/2022]
3. The writ petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
4. Considering that this petition is pending since 2022, in case the petitioner files appeal within four weeks, the same shall be treated to be filed within limitation.
5. The petitioner shall be at liberty to make a request before the appellate authority for an expeditious disposal of the appeal. There is no doubt in the eventuality of request for early disposal of appeal being made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered sympathetically as expeditiously as possible in the facts of the case.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J GAURAV SHARMA /70