Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82180 (MAD)

A.MUGHILVANAN v. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL

WP/29539/2025 · 2025-08-08

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.29539 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No.29539 of 2025 A.Mugilvanan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director General, Highways Department, No.76, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai – 600 025. 2.The Divisional Engineer, Construction and Maintenance, Highway Department, Kallakurichi – 606 202. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to pass an order of appointment to the petitioner herein for any suitable post on compassionate ground, by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 30.11.2021. For Petitioner : M/s.A.Jayanthi For Respondents : Mr.N.Naveen Kumar Government Advocate O R D E R By consent of both the learned counsel for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal, at the admission stage itself. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29539 of 2025 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with a prayer for issuing a Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to pass an order of appointment to the petitioner herein for any suitable post on compassionate ground, by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 30.11.2021. 3. Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's father and mother died. It is the further submission of the petitioner that the petitioner's father, who had worked under the respondent died on 28.08.2011 and immediately, within a period of three years, the petitioner's grandmother had given an application for compassionate appointment and after this petitioner attains majority, he has also given a representation to the 1st respondent on 30.05.2023 and such application is pending before the 1st respondent. 5. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that they will consider the petitioner's 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29539 of 2025 representation according to it's own merits and in accordance with law, within a reasonable time. 6. In such view of the submission, without going into the merits of the writ petition, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.05.2023 and pass orders on it's own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 7. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 08.08.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking order /Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes/No dm To 1.The Director General, Highways Department, No.76, Sardar Patel Road, Guindy, Chennai – 600 025. 2.The Divisional Engineer, Construction and Maintenance, Highway Department, Kallakurichi – 606 202. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.29539 of 2025 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. dm W.P.No.29539 of 2025 08.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis