HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 48455 of 2009 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 17, 2025 A.K.Srivastava Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar, Abhishek Singh, Amit Saxena, Ashish Kumar Dubey, C.L. Pandey, Gaurav Singh, Lal Mani Singh, Rajesh Chandra Dwivedi, S.C.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., C.S. Singh, Madan Mohan, Ravi Anand Agarwal (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Rajendra Prasad Dixit .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad