FAO-5862 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 247 SHRIRAM General Insurance Co. Ltd. Jai Pal and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. 01.04.2017 Karnal, whereby the claim petition bearing dated 04.04.2015 under Section accepted partly with costs to the injured 2. injured on instruction 3. that the whole amount of compensation of injured-claimant vide Award impugned herein, already stands released to 5862-2017 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO Date of Decision: SHRIRAM General Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Saurabh Savra, Advocate for Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Sachin Balda, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present appeal is to the Award dated 01.04.2017 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, whereby the claim petition bearing 04.04.2015, filed by the injured-claimant/ under Sections 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, accepted partly with costs and ₹41,60,500/- injured-claimant. At the very outset, learned counsel injured on instructions submits that respondent No. 1 Learned counsel for appellant the whole amount of compensation of claimant vide Award impugned herein, already stands released to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-5862-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.07.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Saurabh Savra, Advocate for Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for the appellant-Insurance Co. Mr. Sachin Balda, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 1-claimant. Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. Challenge in the present appeal is to the Award dated passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, whereby the claim petition bearing MACP Case No. 12 of 2015 claimant/respondent No. 1 herein of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, was - was awarded as compensation At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent No. 1- respondent No. 1-injured has expired. appellant-Insurance Company submits the whole amount of compensation of ₹41,60,500/- awarded to the claimant vide Award impugned herein, already stands released to Challenge in the present appeal is to the Award dated passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, 12 of 2015 was awarded as compensation Insurance Company submits to the claimant vide Award impugned herein, already stands released to RISHU KATARIA 2025.07.28 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-5862 the deceased and the same may be disposed of as having 4. having been rendered infructuous. 5. 23.07.2025 rishu 5862-2017 (O&M) -2- deceased-claimant. Therefore, nothing survives in the present appeal and the same may be disposed of as having In view of the above, the present appeal is having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .07.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Therefore, nothing survives in the present appeal and the same may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of as Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Therefore, nothing survives in the present appeal as RISHU KATARIA 2025.07.28 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.