Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82173 (KAR)

SMT HARSHITHA N v. SRI NAINITEJ N

WP/17033/2025 · 2025-07-23

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28336 WP No. 17033 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 17033 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SMT HARSHITHA .N W/O MR. NAINITEJ. V, D/O D. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/A FLAT NO. 460/1 3RD MAIN, BASAVA NAGAR ADJACENT TO JANA JEEVA APARTMENT, MARATHALLI COLONY, BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU-560 037 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VYSHAK MANIKANTA S, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI. NAINITEJ N S/O DR. T. VENUGOPAL REDDY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 51052, 5TH FLOOR, BUILDING 5, TOWER 1 PRESTIGE FALCON CITY, KONANKUNTE CROSS, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 062 2. DR. T VENUGOPAL RAO S/O THIMAPPA Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28336 WP No. 17033 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 51052, 5TH FLOOR, BUILDING 5, TOWER 1 PRESTIGE FALCON CITY, KONANKUNTE CROSS, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 062. 3. G. PUSHPALATHA W/O DR. T VENUGOPAL RAO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 51052, 5TH FLOOR, BUILDING 5,TOWER 1 PRESTIGE FALCON CITY, KONANKUNTE CROSS, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 062 …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 10.06.2025 PARTLY ALLOWING THE IA NO.6 IN FILED BY THE R-1 IN THE III ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT IN G AND WC 479/2024 BENGALURU AT ANNX- A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28336 WP No. 17033 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The matter is listed before the Court for non-compliance of office objections. 2. When the matter was listed on 22.07.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court had directed the matter to be listed for 'dismissal' on 23.07.2025. 3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 85