Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8217 (AP)

SAPPARAM SUDHAKAR v. Life Insurance Corporation of India,

WP/3835/2018 · 2025-07-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010087582018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3835/2018 Between: 1. SAPPARAM SUDHAKAR, S/O GURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. SUB STAFF, LIC, SATELLITE OFFICE, SATYAVEDU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, R/O H.NO. 6-144, KALAMA NAIDU PET, SATYAVEDU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. PODILI CHENCHU KRISHNAIAH,, S/O VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC. SUB-STAFF LIC OF INDIA, BRANCH OFFICE, NAIDUPET, NELLORE DISTRICT, R/O MUMMAYAPALEM, OZILI MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. PATAPPA RAMAPPA, S/O THUKULA PATTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC. SUB STAFF, LIC OF INDIA, SATELLITE OFFICE, KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, R/O 2-48, NADIMPALLI, SHANTIPURAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. KALTURI SUDHAKAR, S/O K. VENKATAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC. SUB STAFF LIC OF INDIA, CITY BRANCH -1, NELLORE, R/O MUSUNURI VARI PALEM, MUTHUKUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. PODILI VENKATESWARLU, S/O PITCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC. SUB STAFF LIC OF INDIA, BRANCH OFFICE, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, R/O H.NO.6-222A, VADDE BAZAAR. MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. GALETI SRINIVASULU, S/O G. VENKATA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. SUB STAFF, LIC OF INDIA, SATELLITE OFFICE, PODILI PRAKASAM DISTRICT, R/O 15-2-72, POLERAMMA GUDI, CHINA BUS STAND, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. KOMMIREDDY MALYADRI, S/O KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. SUB-STAFF LIC OF INDIA, SATELLITE OFFICE, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, R/O 9-945B, SIVA NAGAR COLONY, 9TH WARD, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 8. KASI KANAKA DURGA, W/O KASI LOKESH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC. SWEEPER AND SCAVENGER, LIC OF INDIA, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, EDMS DEPARTMENT, RAJAMUNDRY, R/O 2 D.NO.45-23-20, INDIRANAGAR, THADITHOTA, RAJAMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL OFFICE, JEEVAN BHEEMA MARG, YOGA KSHEMA BUILDING, MUMBAI - 40. 2. THE ZONAL MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, HYDERABAD ZONE, JEEVAN BHAGYA BUILDINGS, OPPOSITE SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 3. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, RAJAHMUNDRY DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MORAMPUDI ROAD RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NEAR TTD, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE-524 003. 5. THE BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, SATELLITE OFFICE, SATYAVEDU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517588. 6. THE BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, BRANCH OFFICE, NAIDUPET (65 N), NELLORE DISTRICT-524126 7. THE BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, SATELLITE OFFICE, KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517425. 8. THE BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, CITY BRANCH-I (711), NEAR TTD, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE DISTRICT-524003, 9. THE BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, MARKAPUR (65 A), PRAKASAM DISTRICT-5233 16. 10. THE BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, SATELLITE OFFICE, PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT- 523240. 11. THE BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, SATELLITE OFFICE, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523230. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in taking steps to appoint some other temporary employees in place of the 3 petitioners in the respondents corporation treating the posts held by the petitioners as vacant is highly, arbitrary, bad and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to absorb the petitioners in the post of sub-staff, sweeper and scavenger in the respondents corporation since they have put up service several years and consequently direct the respondents to absorb the petitioners in the post of sub staff, since they have put up service several years in the respondents corporation and pass The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in taking steps to appoint some other temporary employees in place of the petitioners in the respondents corporation treating the posts held by the petitioners as vacant is highly, arbitrary, bad and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to absorb the petitioners in the post of sub-staff, sweeper and scavenger in the respondents corporation since they have put up service several years and consequently direct the respondents to absorb the petitioners in the post of sub staff, since they have put up service several years in the respondents corporation and pass ....” 2. When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioners. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioners today. 4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Corporation is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 5372 of 2018 09.07.2025 Mjl /*