Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82138 (ALL)

TEJVIR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/11185/2025 · 2025-08-05

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:132699 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11185 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tejvir Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankit Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- " I. Issue a necessary writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding to the respondents to pay the entire amount of salary to the petitioner immediately from 20th Feb, 2018 to September, 2022 alongwith a reasonable interest; II. Issue a necessary writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing and commanding the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 10.12.2024, within stipulated period of time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no. 2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Mr. Ashish Kumar Dubey, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no. 2 within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no. 2, Joint Director, Education, Bareilly Mandal, Bareilly, is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Vibha Singh (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad