- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44926 CRP No. 256 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 256 OF 2023 (IO-) BETWEEN: SRI. J.J.DHARMEGOWDA, S/O JULEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O JADAGANAHALLI, MARLE POST, AMBLE HOBLI, CHICKMAGALUR TALUK, CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT – 577 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.V.NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. TRIVENI ARADAVALLI, W/O SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O NO.755, SULLIVAN, WAY GILROY, C.A.C.A.95020 – U.S.A. REPRESENTED BY HER ALLEGED POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. H.L.BALARAMA, S/O LATE LINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O HARIHARADAHALLI VILLAGE, MARLE POST, AMBLE HOBLI, CHIKMAGALUR TALUK, CHIKMAGALUR DISTICT – 577 101. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44926 CRP No. 256 of 2023 2. SMT. K.S.RENUKA, W/O H.R.RANGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O BELOW PAYAS COMPOUND, K.M.ROAD, CHIKMAGALUR – 577 101. 3. SMT. DAKSHAYINI, W/O LATE NINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RAMESHWARA NAGARA, CHIKMAGALUR – 577 101. 4. SRI. A.S.SATHYA NARAYANA, S/O A.M.NINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RAMESHWARA NAGARA, CHIKMAGALUR – 577 101. 5. SRI. A.N.MAHESH, S/O LATE A.M.NINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RAMESHWARA NAGARA, CHIKMAGALUR – 577 101. …RESPONDENTS THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.119/2021 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC IN CHIKMAGALUR; ALLOW THIS PETITION AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.03.2023 PASSED IN OS NO. 119/2021 ON IA NO.4, BY THE LEARNED 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC IN CHIKMAGALUR AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44926 CRP No. 256 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Memo of retirement is filed by the counsel for petitioner along with acknowledgment. 2. Civil Revision Petition is of the year 2023. The Revision Petitioner has not chosen to engage any other advocate. Further, the Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Suit itself is of the year 2021. Notice is also not issued to the respondents. 3. Taking note of the same, Civil Revision petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11 CT:SS