Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8212 (HP)

Sachin Rana v. State Of HP

CRMPM/560/2025 · 2025-03-19

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sachin Rana vs. State of H.P. Cr.MPM No.560 of 2025 19.03.2025 Present: Ms. Anchal Sharma, proxy counsel, for the applicant/appellant. Ms. Swati Driak and Mr. Mandeep Thakur, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent. Cr.MPM No.560 of 2025 Issue notice. Mr. Mandeep Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent. For the reasons stated in the application coupled with the fact that the applicant/appellant is in custody and has filed the appeal through Legal Aid Counsel, it cannot be expected that he could have filed the appeal well within prescribed time, therefore, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 135 days’ that has crept up in filing of the main appeal. Ordered accordingly. Application stands disposed of. The appeal be registered. Cr. Appeal No. /2025 ( Cr.AST No.1579/2025) Admit. Call for the records. Cr.MP No. of 2025(Cr.MPST No.1582/2025) Be registered. The application is disposed of with the direction to the applicant to file translated copies of the documents in question within a period of four weeks. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) Judge March 19, 2025 (reena)