Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8212 (CHH)

VINOD KUMAR LALWANI v. MANISHA LALWANI

WP227/139/2025 · 2025-08-12

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 139 of 2025 1. Vinod Kumar Lalwani S/o Thawardas Lalwani Aged About 40 Years Resident Of Sindhi Colony, Raipur Naka, Durg District Durg (C.G.) 2. Mukesh Lalwani S/o Thawardas Lalwani Aged About 44 Years Resident Of Sindhi Colony, Raipur Naka, Durg District Durg (C.G.) 3. Rajesh Kumar Lalwani S/o Thawardas Lalwani Aged About 48 Years Resident Of Sindhi Colony, Raipur Naka, Durg District Durg (C.G.) 4. Naresha Kumar Lalwani S/o Thawardas Lalwani Aged About 46 Years Resident Of Sindhi Colony, Raipur Naka, Durg District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Manisha Lalwani W/o Late Ashok Kumar Lalwani Aged About 47 Years Resident Of Street No. 1, Telibandha, Near Jawahar Katpice Stores, Raipur (C.G.) 2. Sweta Lalwani D/o Late Ashok Kumar Lalwani Resident Of Street No. 1, Telibandha, Near Jawahar Katpice Stores, Raipur (C.G.) 3. Tushar Lalwani S/o Late Ashok Kumar Lalwani Resident Of Street No. 1, Telibandha, Near Jawahar Katpice Stores, Raipur (C.G.) 4. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. B.L. Sahu, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 3 : Ms. Pushpa Dwivedi, Advocate For State : Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 13. 08.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, this petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.08.13 15:15:53 +0530