Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8210 (BOM)

SANJAY RAGHUNATH BAWISKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/6841/2025 · 2025-06-20

Shri Ravindra V Ghuge, Shri Y G Khobragade

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

wp-6840.25+ 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1334 WRIT PETITION NO. 6840 OF 2025 SANJAY RAGHUNATH BAWISKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 1335 WRIT PETITION NO. 6841 OF 2025 SANJAY RAGHUNATH BAWISKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Mr. Anand S. Deshpande Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. S.G. Bhalerao Advocate for Resp. Nos. 3 and 4. ... CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2025 ORDER : 1. The notice issued to respondent Nos.3 and 4 as per order dated 15th September 2025 through Registry is awaited and the learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that in view of Para No.6 of the said order, the petitioners have served the copy of wp-6840.25+ 2 this order to respondent Nos.3 and 4. But still the petitioner may file the affidavit regarding the service. He submits that in view of the said order there were three compliances to be made, one at his end and two were to be performed by respondent No.3 and 4. 2. Taking into consideration the statement and the liberty that was given to the petitioners to serve respondent Nos.3 and 4 personally i.e. Mr. Umesh Wankhede and Mr. Rupesh Baliram Hire, they have failed to appear. Issue bailable warrant for Rs.5000/- each against them to be made returnable on 16th October 2025. [HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE asb/OCT25