SUBHASH TALAN TEMPO SERVICE v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/20831/2025 · 2025-07-28
Lisa Gill, Meenakshi I Mehta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82097 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82097 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-20831-2025
Date of Decision: July 28, 2025
M/S SUBHASH TALAN TEMPO SERVICE
..... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
..... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present: Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana for respondents No. 1 and 3.
Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 4.
**** LISA GILL, J.
1.
Prayer in this writ petition is for directing respondents to open financial bids of tender issued on 07.04.2025.
2.
Learned counsel for State, on instructions of DFSC-cum-District Manager, CONFED, Faridabad, submits that vigilance inquiry was being conducted qua petitioner in respect to some allegations of bungling. Inquiry has been concluded and tender process is likely to be finalized with next four weeks, therefore, present petition, it is submitted, is rendered infructuous.
3.
Faced with above, learned counsel for petitioner is unable to deny that said petition is indeed infructuous.
RITU SHARMA 2025.07.30 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-20831-2025
-2-
4.
Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Needless to say, in case of any findings adverse to petitioner, it is at liberty to avail remedy(ies) available to it in accordance with law.
(LISA GILL)
JUDGE
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) July 28, 2025
JUDGE Rts
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
RITU SHARMA 2025.07.30 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document