Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82097 (PNJ)

SUBHASH TALAN TEMPO SERVICE v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/20831/2025 · 2025-07-28

Lisa Gill, Meenakshi I Mehta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20831-2025 Date of Decision: July 28, 2025 M/S SUBHASH TALAN TEMPO SERVICE ..... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present: Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana for respondents No. 1 and 3. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 4. **** LISA GILL, J. 1. Prayer in this writ petition is for directing respondents to open financial bids of tender issued on 07.04.2025. 2. Learned counsel for State, on instructions of DFSC-cum-District Manager, CONFED, Faridabad, submits that vigilance inquiry was being conducted qua petitioner in respect to some allegations of bungling. Inquiry has been concluded and tender process is likely to be finalized with next four weeks, therefore, present petition, it is submitted, is rendered infructuous. 3. Faced with above, learned counsel for petitioner is unable to deny that said petition is indeed infructuous. RITU SHARMA 2025.07.30 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-20831-2025 -2- 4. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Needless to say, in case of any findings adverse to petitioner, it is at liberty to avail remedy(ies) available to it in accordance with law. (LISA GILL) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) July 28, 2025 JUDGE Rts Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RITU SHARMA 2025.07.30 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document