Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80881 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2024 Thana- SISWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== Ravindra Yadav Son of Late Thakur Yadav Village- Chhitauli, P.S.- Chainpur, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar 1, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 6 27-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 243 of 2024 lodged on 21.07.2024, for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126, 115(2), 109, 352, 351, 3(5) & 118 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The allegation in the First Information Report is against as many as 11 accused persons who came at the door of the informant and assaulted him and his family members. As per the FIR, different allegations have been attributed to the different accused persons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as the petitioner is concerned, the allegation in the FIR is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80881 of 2024(6) dt.27-05-2025 2/3 with regard to the assault upon Surendra Yadav by means of farsa on his head. There is no allegation upon this petitioner of assaulting anyone else. The final injury report of the injured Surendra Yadav is available in the records of the case of Cr. Misc. No.79980 of 2024 which would show that the injured Surendra Yadav has received injury which is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object. On the strength of such injury report, it has been submitted that the allegation of assault by means of farsa is also falsified and hence, the injury report does not corroborate the oral allegation made in the FIR. Further, it has also been submitted that the informant and petitioner are own pattidar and land dispute is going on between the parties. There is a case and counter case filed by both the parties and injuries have also been sustained by both the parties. It has also been submitted that some of the accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 08.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.79980 of 2024.
The petitioner is in custody since 25.07.2024 with no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Taking into consideration the present facts and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80881 of 2024(6) dt.27-05-2025 3/3 circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Siwan, in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 243 of 2024. Divyansh/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T