[2025:RJ-JP:8548] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 262/2025 1. Smt. Suman Bunkar W/o Shri Kaluram Meena D/o Shri Rajesh Bunkar, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Village Kunjbiharipura, The Phagi, Mandor, Jaipur. At Present Resident Of Village Barsinghpura, Punana, District Jaipur. 2. Kaluram Meena S/o Shri Kailash Chand Meena, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Barsinghpura, Punana, District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (Raj). 3. The Station House Officer (Nodal Officer) Police Station , Kaladera, District Jaipur. 4. The Station House Officer (Nodal Officer) Police Station, Phagi, District Jaipur. 5. The District Nodal Officer, Jaipur (Raj). 6. Rajesh Bunkar S/o Shri Namalum, Resident Of Village Kunjbiharipura, The Phagi, Mandor, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 25/02/2025 1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Registry is over-ruled. 2. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of necessary directions to the respondent authorities to provide adequate security and protection to them, as they are facing grave threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent No.6. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and they solemnized their marriage at their [2025:RJ-JP:8548] (2 of 2) [CRLW-262/2025] own free will and registered the same in the Marriage Registration Office on 07.02.2025. However, their family members are not agreeable to their marriage and have threatened them of dire consequences. He prays that adequate police protection be provided to the petitioners. 4. Though no specific instance or imminent threat has been pleaded but considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and having regard to the facts & circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that if the petitioners are having any apprehension or threat perception about their life and liberty from their relatives, they may move an appropriate representation before the Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur, indicating their concern with the name(s) of probable assailants. 5. If any such representation is moved by the petitioners, the Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur, shall consider the same and after analyzing the factual situation, pass necessary orders or take action to ward off any untoward incident. 6. It is hereby clarified that this order may not be construed to be a validation of petitioners’ marriage and proof of their age. Any observation made herein shall not affect any criminal or civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners, at the instance of their relatives. 7. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. 8. The stay application also stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAHIL SONI /408