- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1186 WP No. 107420 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.107420 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI GOUSE MOHDDIN SAB S/O. BUDDAN SAB TOTAD, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MEDUR VILLAGE, TQ: RATTIHALLI, DIST: HAVERI – 581 116. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SRINAND A. PACHHAPURE AND SRI RAJENDRA A. PATIL, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR, RATTIHALLI POLICE STATION, RATTIHALLI, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST: HAVERI – 581 116. 2. SRI BASAPPA S/O. RANGAPPA TIPPANNAVAR, AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MEDUR VILLAGE, TQ: RATTIHALLI, DIST: HAVERI – 581 116. 3. SRI MALLAPPA S/O. BASAPPA TIPPANNAVAR, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1186 WP No. 107420 of 2024 R/O: MEDUR VILLAGE, TQ: RATTIHALLI, DIST: HAVERI – 581 116. 4. SRI RAMESH S/O. BASAPPA TIPPANNAVAR, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MEDUR VILLAGE, TQ: RATTIHALLI, DIST: HAVERI – 581 116. 5. SHRI SHIDDAPPA S/O. RANGAPPA TIPPANNAVAR, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MEDUR VILLAGE, TQ: RATTIHALLI, DIST: HAVERI – 581 116. 6. SRI MAHESH S/O. SHIDDAPPA TIPPANNAVAR, AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MEDUR VILLAGE, TQ: RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI – 581 116. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE A DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO PROVIDE POLICE PROTECTION TO THE PETITIONER PURSUANT TO ORDER DATED 20/06/2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR ON I.A. NO. 3 IN O.S. NO. 322/2021 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-E AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THERIEN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1186 WP No. 107420 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking Police protection for usage of the land belonging to the petitioner. 2. Learned AGA on instructions would submit that the Police protection is granted and the petitioner and others against whom the grievance is projected by the petitioner were called to the Police Station and the person against whom the complaint is now made have undertaken that they would not interfere with the possession of the petitioner, is the submission of the learned AGA. 3. In that light, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition with the further direction that in the event the need of Police protection would emerge in real time, the respondent - State shall accord Police protection for the usage of the land of the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50