Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
24.Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:119832 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25026 of 2024 Petitioner :- Bharat Lal Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State.
2. The petitioner has preferred present writ petition inter-alia with the prayer to direct the respondent no.2-District Collector, District Chitrakoot to decide the representation dated 24.03.2023 made by elected Gram Sabha Members and Villagers as early as possible.
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the aforesaid representation was supported by an affidavit and in the said representation a prayer has been made to initiate the proceedings against the Gram Pradhan as well as Secretary and Contractor of the village concerned but till date no decision has been taken in the matter.
4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself.
5. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation ventilating all his grievances before the respondent no.2 along-with certified copy of this order within a period of three weeks from today along-with copy of the earlier representation as well as affidavit, which are appended along-with this writ petition or any other documents, which is placed reliance upon by the petitioner in the present writ petition. If such a representation is made, the respondent no.2 is directed to pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a further period of six weeks.
6. With the aforesaid observations, present writ petition is disposed of finally. Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Pramod Tripathi Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad