MUKESH SAW ALIAS MUKESH KUMAR SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2494/2025 · 2025-07-23
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8207 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8207 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025: JHHC:20395
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 1175 of 2025
Raj Kumar Dutta, aged about 37 years, son of Sri Ashok Kumar Dutta, resident of Nunudih, Near Kali Mandir, P.O. Pathardih, P.S. Sudamdih, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand
---
--- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
---
--- Opp. Party With B.A. No. 2434 of 2025 NATHANI TARUN ASHOK @ ASHOK TARUN BHAI NATHANI @ TARUN BHAI NATHANI @ T.A. NATHANI, Aged 35 Years, Son of Ashok Bhai Nathani @ Ashok Nathani, R/o Vill. Motasurka, Tahsil Sihor, P.O. & P.S. Sihor, Dist Bhawnagar, Gujarat
---
--- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
---
--- Opp. Party With B.A No. 2494 of 2025 Mukesh Saw @ Mukesh Kumar Saw, age of 32 years S/o Sagar Saw, R/o Bhowra Bara Bangal, P.O and P.S- Jorapokhar Bhowra District-Dhanbad
---
--- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
---
--- Opp. Party
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
For the Petitioner: Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate [B.A. 1175/2025]
Mr. Vikram Sinha, Advocate [B.A. 2434/2025]
Mr. Birendra Burman, Advocate [B.A.2494/2025]
For the O.P-State: Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P. [B.A. 1175/2025]
Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P [B.A. 2434/2025]
Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P [B.A. 2494/2025]
03 / 23.07.2025 All these bail applications arise out of the same police case. Accordingly, they are being disposed of by a common order. Heard the parties.
2. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Jharia P.S. Case No. 212 of 2024 for the offences registered under sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and section 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of Sri Rajiv Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad.
3. Petitioners Raj Kumar Dutta and Mukesh Saw enticed 46 persons to handover their documents of identification and other documents and misused
2. the same by getting about 160 vehicles financed in the name of the victims. They did not pay the monthly installments of those financed vehicles. It is alleged that the vehicles in question were sent to the petitioner Nathani Tarun Ashok @ Ashok Tarun Bhai Nathani in Gujarat.
4. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail stands rejected.
(Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded