IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMAHA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARt^, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23190 OF 2009 Between: Smt.N.Narasamma, W/o.Narasimhulu, Aged about 45 years, Casual Labour Agricultural College farm, Mahanandi, Kurnool District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Registrar, N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad. 2. The Superintendent, Agriculture College, Mahanandi, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or directions more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Management herein not regularizing the service of the petitioner under G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.4.1994 or in any of the Government orders existing as on date as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Articles, 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequentially to pass appropriate orders with ail consequential benefits including the seniority and fixation of pay and in arrears. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 30127 OF 20091 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2"^^ respondent herein to continue the petitioner as Casual Labour in the 2"^^ respondent college. i.A. NO: 2 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 30128 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1®^ respondent herein to consider the claim of the petitioner for Regularization as per the G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.4.1994. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GANGISETTY RAJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. S. PRANATHI, SC FOR ANGRAU The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010087372009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] t THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY-FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23190/2009 Between: Smt.N.Narasamma, Mahanandi, Kurnool District AND The Registrar N.G.Ranga Agricultural University Another ...RESPONDENT(S) and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .GANGISETTY RAJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. YELLA REDDY RAJANALA (SC FOR ANGRAU) 2.SPRANATHI The Court made the following ORDER: ...PETITIONER Heard Sri G. Rajeswar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M. Rahul Chowdary, learned counsel representing Smt. S. Pranathi, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in not regularizing the service of the petitioner under G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994 as illegal, arbitrary, etc., and for consequential direction. w 2 i > 3. Petitioner was appointed as a casual labour in the 2’^^ respondent College in the year 1983 and ever since the appointment she has been discharging her duties without any deviation. It is the case of the petitioner that though she had completed 26 years of service in the 2^^^ respondent College, the process of regularization of her service is being delayed. In that regard, a proposal was made by the Associate Dean, Agriculture College, Mahanandi, Kurnool District., to the 1 St respondent vide proceedings No.250/Admin-I/Age/09 dated 10.07.2009, wherein, he has enclosed all the relevant information along with documents/pertaining to two persons i.e. P.Jayamma and N. Narsamma-writ petitioner, who are on muster rolls and had completed more than 5 years of service for filling up vacant posts. Pursuant to the said proposal, the person in Serial No.1 namely, P. Jayamma’s case was considered for regularization of service and the petitioner’s case is still pending. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, while reiterating the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, restricts his prayer and sought for a direction to consider the case of the petitioner on par with the similarly circumstanced person in the proposal dated 10.07.2009. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has fairly agreed for the disposal of the writ petition. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and in the light of the proposal dated 10.07.2009, without going into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the c -• f V 3 ^ ■ 1®* respondent to consider the case of the petitioner, on par with the similarly circumstanced person referred to supra, in accordance with Law, within a period of ten (10) weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. Sd/- J.SAROJA ASSIST^ //TRUE COPY// T REGISTRAR frSECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Registrar, N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendra Naqar Hyderabad. The Superintendent, Agriculture College, Mahanandi, Kurnool District, One CC to Sri Gangisetty Rajeswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Smt. S. Pranathi, SC for ANGRAU [OPUC] Three C.D. Copies. 2. 3. 4. 5. Cnr w m / HIGH COURT DATED:02/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.23190 of 2009 0 6 FEB 2025 ^ . Current Sectioi DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS