Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82056 (ALL)

AMEER SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/25737/2025 · 2025-08-04

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:131685 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25737 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ameer Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Singh,Archana Devi,Ram Rang Patel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- " i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.2 i.e. District Magistrate/Collector Kaushambi, District-Kaushambi to maintain status-quo on the spot restraining the respondent No.4 and 5 till the disposal of application dated 20.06.2025 filed by the petitioner along with others against the Gaonsabha, Mauja-Manikpur, Pargana-Kada, Tehsil-Sirathu, District-Kaushambi, under Section-38(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court (Annexure No.1 to the writ petition). ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.3 i.e. Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil-Sirathu, District-Kaushambi to maintain status-quo on the spot restraining the respondent No.4 and 5 till the disposal of Restoration Application and objection filed by the petitioner in Case No.3780 of 2024, Computerized Case No.T202402420403780 (Dheer Singh Vs. Mahendra Singh and Others), under Section-24 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, within stipulated time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court (Annexure No.1 to the writ petition)." 2. The prayer made in the writ petition cannot be granted as proceedings under Section 38(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are pending consideration. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon officer concerned to conclude the proceedings under Section 38(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad