Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82052 (PNJ)

AMRITSAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SURJAN SINGH AND ORS

RFA/1966/2015 · 2025-04-04

Anil Kshetarpal

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, AMRITSAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AMRITSAR SURJAN SINGH AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. Court in PUNJAB V. BHAN SINGH AND ORS. (Regular First Appeal No. 641 2016 (O&M) 2. disposed of. 04.04. 2025 Poonam Sharma IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, AT CHANDIGARH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1966 OF 2015 RESERVED ON: PRONOUNCED ON AMRITSAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AMRITSAR VERSUS SURJAN SINGH AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL t: Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for PUDA. Mr. R.D. Bawa, Advocate Mr. Samuel Gill, Advocate Mr. Rishabh Rana, Advocate Mr. Randhir Bawa, Advocate Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate Mr. Neeraj Kaler, Advocate Mr. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Himani Kapila, Advocate Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate Mr. Narinder Kumar Vadehra, Advocate Mr. Sushil Saini, Advocate Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate Ms. Ravinder Kaur Manaise, Advocate for the landowner (s). *** ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. For orders, see a separate detailed order of even date passed by this Court in HOUSE & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (PUDA) PUNJAB V. BHAN SINGH AND ORS. (Regular First Appeal No. 641 2016 (O&M). The miscellaneous application( disposed of. 04.04. 2025 Poonam Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1966 OF 2015 (O&M) RESERVED ON: 18.03.2025 PRONOUNCED ON: 04.04.2025 AMRITSAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AMRITSAR APPELLANT(s) RESPONDENT(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Advocate for PUDA. Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate for e Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate Mr. Narinder Kumar Vadehra, Advocate Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate Ms. Ravinder Kaur Manaise, Advocate For orders, see a separate detailed order of even date passed by this URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (PUDA) PUNJAB V. BHAN SINGH AND ORS. (Regular First Appeal No. 641 of The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, shall stand (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No :Yes/No For orders, see a separate detailed order of even date passed by this URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (PUDA) of s) pending, if any, shall stand POONAM SHARMA 2025.04.19 21:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document