DINESH KUMAR JAISWAL v. SMT PREETI JAISWAL AND ANOTHER
A227/8719/2025 · 2025-08-07
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82034 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82034 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:134388 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8719 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Jaiswal Respondent :- Smt Preeti Jaiswal And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Niraj Tiwari,Rakesh Maurya Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"To direct the Additional Civil Judge, (S.D.), Court No. 11 Prayagraj to decide the interim injunction application 6-C dated 27.5.2024 on the next date fixed or within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Additional Civil Judge, (S.D.), Court No. 11 Prayagraj to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 8.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad