Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27426 CRL.P No. 10145 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10145 OF 2025 (439(1)(b)(Cr.PC) / 483(1)(b)(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
MR. THULASIRAMAN K SON OF KUMAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO. 8/77 LIC MOOGAMBIKAI STREET KARASANGAL, KANCHEEPURAM TAMIL NADU - 601 301
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAJANNA B C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF CUSTOMS CUSTOMS INTELLIGENCE UNIT (CIU AIRPORT AND AIR CARGO COMPLEX BENGALURU - 560 300 REP. BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT COMPLEX BENGALURU-560 001
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT.WAHEEDA M.M. HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439(1)(b) CR.PC (FILED U/S 483(1)(b) OF BNSS) TO MODIFY THE BAIL ORDER CONDITION NO.II IN CRL.P.NO.7029/2025 DATED 20.05.2025 PASSED BY THIS COURT.
Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27426 CRL.P No. 10145 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed seeking for modification of the bail
order dated 20.05.2025 in condition No. ii(a) passed in Crl.P.No.7029/2025 by this Court.
2. The registry has raised an objection regarding filing of this petition as the petitioner had already approached this Court in Crl.P.No.7029/2025. However, since it is a modification of the earlier order, the petition is maintainable.
3. After perusing the records, it is noticed that, on 20.05.2025, it was ordered in the point ii (a) of the operative portion of the order that “the petitioner shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court”.
4. In view of the above, the same may be corrected as
“petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.”
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27426 CRL.P No. 10145 of 2025
5. The office objection raised by the Registry is over-ruled, thereby, the Point ii (a) is hereby modified.
Ordered, accordingly.
Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1