- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25093 WP No. 20155 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20155 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: VENKATESH H.B. S/O LATE H.T. BASAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST, R/AT HANIYUMBODI VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA B. HARAVIGOWDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT. OF REVENUE, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DY. COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 401. 3. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER MANDYA SUB DIVISION, MANDYA - 571 401. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA - 571 401. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25093 WP No. 20155 of 2025 5. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, SANTHEKASALAGERE VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401. 6. SRINIVASA H.C. S/O LATE H.T. HONNEGOWDA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/AT HANIYUMBODI VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R5) ----- THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING OF IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE R2 DATED 10.06.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-E BEARING NO. RP 284/2024, GRANT AN INTERIM PRAYER TO STAYING THE OPERATION AND ALL OTHER PROCEEDINGS IN PURSUANCE OF IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE R2 DATED 10.06.2025 IN RP NO. 284/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25093 WP No. 20155 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents no.1 to 5. 2. In this writ petition the petitioner is assailing the order dated 10.06.2025 (Annexure-E) in R.P.No.284/24 on the file of respondent no.2. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the finding recorded by both the authorities, it would indicate that O.S.640/2012 is pending consideration before the Competent Court in respect of the subject land. 4. In that view of the matter, unless the rights of the parties is crystallized in the aforesaid civil suit, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in the present writ petition as, both the respondents/authorities, having taken note of the factual aspects on record, have recorded a clear finding that the petitioner herein has to establish his rights in the subject land. With the aforesaid observations, writ petition is liable to be rejected and is accordingly, rejected. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE rs/CT: BHK