- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31858 WP No. 32540 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 32540 OF 2024 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. MR. TERENCE D SOUZA S/O LATE ALBERT D SOUZA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT NO.12, THE RIDGE HAMPTON PARK VIC – 3976, AUSTRALIA REPRESENTED BY HIS GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. G. MAHENDRA S/O GANGAHDAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.107, 2ND MAIN, MLA LAYOUT, NEAR EURO KIDS, R.T.NAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESWARA P.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPUR SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPUR - 561 203 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31858 WP No. 32540 of 2024 3. THE TAHSILDAR DODDABALLAPUR - 561203 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.P.YOGANNA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 31/08/2018 PASSED LRF.SR(DU) 27/2008-09 BY THE R2 AT ANNEXURE-A AND TO DIRECT THE R3 TO REMOVE THE ENTRY MADE IN THE COLUMN NO. 9 OF THE RTC AS SARKARAKKE MUTTAGOLU AND TO RESTORE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE REVENUE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF THE LAND MEASURING 0-10.085 GUNTA OF PROPERTY IN SY.NO.121 OF HADONA HALLI VILLAGE, TUBUGERE VILLAGE, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of forfeiture dated 31.08.2018 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Doddaballapura Sub-Division, Doddaballapura under the provisions of Section 83 for - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31858 WP No. 32540 of 2024 violation of the provisions contained in Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a case where the impugned order of forfeiture has been passed by the Assistant Commissioner without notice to the petitioner. It is further submitted that under similar circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7821/2021 has passed an order dated 16.08.2021 remanding the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing to the aggrieved person. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate points out from the impugned order that notice was indeed issued to the petitioner and in spite of notice having been issued, the petitioner did not appear before the Assistant Commissioner. 5. Admittedly, as on the date of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, no proceedings were pending before any court/authority. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31858 WP No. 32540 of 2024 6. This Court had several occasions to consider such cases, where writ petitions are filed long after the provisions contained in Sections 79A, 79B and 79C were omitted from the statute book in terms of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Second Amendment) Act, 2020. It is the consistent opinion of this Court that if at any rate, the Assistant Commissioner, after forfeiting the land has not disposed of the same in accordance with law then the benefit of the saving clause contained in Section 12 of the Amending Act is required to be given to such petitioners. The Assistant Commissioner is therefore, required to ascertain, whether the declared excess lands or forfeited lands still remain with the State Government or has been granted to third parties. If the lands have been granted to third party, then sub-section(1) of Section 12 of the amending Act will apply to say that the proceedings have reached finality. Or otherwise, sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Amending Act will apply and all further - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31858 WP No. 32540 of 2024 proceedings shall be declared as abated by the Assistant Commissioner. 7. Having considered the submission of the learned Counsels and on perusing the judgment of the co-ordinate Bench in W.P.No.7821/2021, this Court finds that facts and circumstances in both these matters are quite similar and therefore, the benefit of the decision of the co- ordinate bench should also enure to the petitioner herein. 8. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to pass the following: ORDER i) The writ petition is disposed of. ii) The matter is remanded back to the respondent-Assistant Commissioner to consider the case of the petitioner including the consequences of the subsequent amendment brought to the provisions of Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act in Karnataka Amendment No.56 of 2020. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31858 WP No. 32540 of 2024 iii) If revenue entries have been altered pursuant to the impugned order dated 31.08.2018, the same shall be restored in favour of the petitioner. iv) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent-Assistant Commissioner on 8th September 2025, without waiting for further notice from the Assistant Commissioner. Ordered accordingly. 9. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE RHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14