Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8200 (GAU)

AYUB ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

WP(C)/1252/2025 · 2025-06-24

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010039902025 2025:GAU-AS:8552 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1252/2025 AYUB ALI S/O ABDUL AHED, VILL- SINGIMARI BENGALI GAON, P.S.-DHEKIAJULI, DIST- SONITPUR (ASSAM) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GUWAHATI-06, ASSAM 2:THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 ASSAM 3:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37 ASSAM 4:THE DISTRICT DELIMITATION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SONITPUR-782001 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, BARASHA BORAH BORDOLOI,MR. A H M R CHOUDHURY Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., SC, S E C,GA, ASSAM Linked Case : WP(C)/1306/2025 NURUL AHMED S/O LATE IMAN ALI VILL- NO. 2 TIULIP (ALIMABAD JUTE GRANT) P.S.- DHEKIAJULI DIST- SONITPUR (ASSAM) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 06. 2:THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37 4:THE DISTRICT DELIMITATION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SONITPUR PIN-782001 ------------ Advocate for : MR H R A CHOUDHURY Advocate for : SC P AND R.D. appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 25.06.2025 1. Mr. A. H. M. R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the writ petitions have become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, both the writ petitions stand closed being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant