IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80231 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2024 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Munna Kumar @ Munna Kumar Singh S/O Late Garibnath Singh @ Gariban Singh Resident of village - Akhityarpur, Patedha, P.S- Sarai , District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 80763 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2024 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Nehal Kumar S/O Santosh Kumar Singh R/O village - Anjani, P. S - Sarai , District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 80231 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 80763 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 14-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State. 2. In this case, the petitioners are seeking regular bail in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 52 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the IPC. 3. Allegedly, when the informant after taking breakfast came out from the hotel, he did not find his motorcycle, parked outside the hotel. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80231 of 2024(2) dt.14-02-2025 2/2 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to police maneuvering and mechanism at the instance of his enemies. They are not named in the FIR. Except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioners. The petitioners are under custody for near about eight months. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judicial-XI-cum-A.C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur/ A.C.J.M.-X, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 52 of 2024, subject to the following condition that the petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court. priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T