Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81986 (KAR)

SRI. JINSUN v. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

WP/25484/2023 · 2025-10-09

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39758 WP NO.25484 OF 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.25484 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. JINSUN S/O RAJU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT ADDAHOLE HOUSE, SHIRADI VILLAGE, KADABA TALUK. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAYAPRAKASH K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY SUB-DIVISION, BELURU. 2. EXECUTIVE OFFICER NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT, MANGALURU. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER N.H.75 (48), B.C. ROAD SECTION, HASSAN. 4. URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SHIRADI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, SHIRADI, KADABA TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39758 WP NO.25484 OF 2023 5. PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SHIRADI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, SHIRADI, KADABA TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT. 6. P.J. JOSEPH YANE MAMACHAN S/O JOSEPH, ARELE HOUSE, SHIRADI VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20TH SEPTEMBER, 2022 AND 09TH NOVEMBER, 2022 MADE BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURES 'A' AND 'B'; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. This petition is of the year-2023 and listed for sixth time for non-compliance of office objections. 3. Despite having been granted sufficient time, learned counsel for the petitioner failed to comply with the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39758 WP NO.25484 OF 2023 office objections. This non-compliance by the petitioner would indicate that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22