Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81982 (MAD)

Periyasamy v. K.M.Sarayu

CONT P/3526/2024 · 2025-04-01

K Govindarajan Thilakavadi, M Sundar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont. P. No.3526 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 01.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI Cont. Petn. No.3526 of 2024 Periyasamy Petitioner vs. Tmt. K.M. Sarayu, I.A.S. District Collector Office of the Collector Krishnagiri District Respondent Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 13.06.2024 passed in W.P.No.15264 of 2024. For petitioner Mr. S. Viswanathan for M/s. Dass and Viswa Associates ORDER [made by M.SUNDAR, J.] Matter mentioned at half past ten. 2. Mr. S. Vishwanathan, learned counsel of M/s. Dass and Viswa Associates (Law Firm), learned counsel on record for contempt Page Nos.1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont. P. No.3526 of 2024 petitioner, submits that the order out of which the captioned contempt petition (hereinafter 'CP' for the sake of brevity) arises, has since been complied. Learned counsel submits that he has instructions from the petitioner not to press or pursue the captioned CP. Saying so, learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows: 3. In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned CP is disposed of as closed. Though obvious, we make it clear that the respondent will stand purged of the contempt. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S., J.) (K.G.T., J.) 01.04.2025 cad Index : Yes/No NC : Yes/No Page Nos.2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont. P. No.3526 of 2024 M.SUNDAR, J. and K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. cad Cont. Petn. No.3526 of 2024 01.04.2025 Page Nos.3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis