Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81982 (ALL)

DHEERENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/11302/2025 · 2025-08-06

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133584 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11302 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dheerendra Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard Sri Kailash Prakash Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has prayed before this Court for consideration of his representation for request of transfer at the place where his wife is working in the light of the provisions contained in the transfer policy as per which as far as both the spouses should have been given same place of posting. He has taken plea of the judgment of this Court passed in Writ A No.9383 of 2025 (Mohanveer (Sub-Inspector) Pno No.172240121 v. The State of U.P. and another) on 11.07.2025. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the contrary submits that the petitioner is seeking benefit of clause meant for spouses to be posted at same station whereas his wife is working as Assistant Teacher in the school run by Basic Education Board and hence is not a Government teacher and further everytime petitioner cannot avail the benefit of the relevant clause of the transfer policy which provides that as far as possible spouse should be given posting at the same place. 4. Thus according to learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner submits that wife being teacher will continue to remain at a particular station and petitioner cannot always take a plea the he should be posted at a station where his wife is working or any nearby station. 5. Be that as it may, since the petitioner wants his request to be considered, I hereby provide that petitioner shall make a fresh representation regarding his claim before competent respondent authority within a period of two weeks, the same shall be looked into and considered and also disposed of as expeditiously as possible preferably within a further period of four weeks after giving opportunity of hearing to all the appearing parties. 6. Needless to add order to be passed shall be reasoned and speaking one. Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Deepika Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad