Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8198 (ALL)

MOTILAL VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/1227/2025 · 2025-03-05

Ashwani Kumar Mishra, Donadi Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:32965-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1227 of 2025 Petitioner :- Motilal Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner wants this Court to direct holding of inquiry against Gram Pradhan and Panchayati Raj Adhikari, for the works done in various years. It is stated that the Committee has also been constituted. So far as allegation against Gram Pradhan is concerned, proper procedure for making of the complaint would be in terms of Rule 3 of the UP Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhan and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997. No such complaint appears to have been made. The petitioner otherwise is not a person aggrieved and the writ has not been filed in public interest. In such circumstances, at the instance of the petitioner, we refrain from issuing any direction. The writ petition is consequently dismissed. However, dismissal of the writ petition will not preclude the authorities from examining the grievances on merits, in accordance with law. It is otherwise open for the petitioner to lodge a statutory complaint permissible in law. Order Date :- 6.3.2025 rkg Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad