Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81963 (ALL)

SAROJ YADAV v. State of UP AND 7 Others

A482/25346/2024 · 2025-03-16

Vikas Budhwar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37532 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25346 of 2024 Applicant :- Saroj Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 7 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J. 1. Heard Sri S.K. Tiwari (AOR No.A/S 1627/12) holding brief of Sri Jitendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri S.K. Singh, learned A.G.A. for State. 2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed, notices are not being issued to O.P. No. 2. 3. The sole prayer made in the present application is to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate/ FTC, Basti to decide the Complaint Case No. 12022 of 2022 (Saroj Yadav vs. Vijay Yadav & Ors), under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC & Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Gaur, District Basti expeditiously within the time bound period. 4. Learned A.G.A. submits that has no objection to the same. 5. Considering the submissions made across the bar, the application stands disposed of requiring the court below to decide the said proceedings after hearing the respective parties with most expedition without granting unnecessary adjournment that too not beyond a period of 10 days at a stretch subject to legal impediment. 6. Passing of this order may not be construed that this Court has adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 17.3.2025 C. MANI Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad