NAVNEET SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/4685/2025 · 2025-05-14
Sandeep Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8196 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8196 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4685 of 2025 Date of Decision: 14.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Navneet Sharma and Another …….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Others
….Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Before notices, if any, could be issued to the respondents, learned counsel representing the petitioners, on instructions, states that petitioners would be content and satisfied in case their case is considered and decided in the light of judgment dated 16.07.2020, passed by Coordinate Bench this Court in CWPOA No.441 of 2019, titled Sant Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others.
2. While putting in appearance on behalf of respondents, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 petitioners and case of the petitioners shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with aforesaid judgment.
3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioners in light of Sant Ram (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners and pass appropriate orders thereafter. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 14, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)