Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34160 WP No. 9804 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 9804 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. D.R. THIPPESWAMY S/O LATE P. DODDARANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT A R ROOPA AMDIALAGONDI GRAMA PANCHAYATH MADAKSIRA TALUK, ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT ANDHRAPRADESH. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. LAKSHMIKANTH .K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. K.R. SRIDEVI W/O D.R. THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
2.
T. JEEVAN S/O D.R. THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS
3.
T. SRUJAN S/O D.R. THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT.K.R. SRIDEVI THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34160 WP No. 9804 of 2024
ALL ARE R/AT TEACHERS COLONY PAVAGADA TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT-561 202. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 7.03.2023 PASSED IN CRL MIS NO. 1000/2021 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 125 OF CRPC BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PAVAGADA AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND CONFIRMED BY THE LEARNED IV ADDL DIST AND SESSION JUDGE TUMKUR, SITTING AT MADHUGIRI IN CRL RP NO. 5009/2023 DATED 16.09.2023 AT ANNEXURE- D.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FRESH MATTERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL ORDER
Office objection in regard to maintainability of revision is over ruled since petitioner is assailing the order of maintenance passed by the learned Magistrate and affirmed by the revisional Court in Crl.R.P.No.5009/2023.
2. This petition is filed seeking quashing of the concurrent orders wherein the petitioner is directed to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.4,000/- to the wife and Rs.2,000/- to each of the children. On examining the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34160 WP No. 9804 of 2024
records, it is forthcoming that petitioner is working as a Teacher and is drawing a salary of Rs.32,000/-. Therefore, on examining the order under challenge, this Court is of the view that the maintenance awarded is infact on the lower side. Since he is drawing salary of Rs.32,000/-, a moderate maintenance is awarded by both the Courts below.
The matter therefore, may not warrant interference with by this Court.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
ALB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63