Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8195 (MAD)

S.AMARAVATHI v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./1641/2025 · 2026-07-09

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.No.1641 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN WP.Crl.No.1641 of 2025 S.Amaravathi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur. 3.The Inspector of Police, Pullarambakkam Police Station, Thiruvallur. 4.Chettu (R4 impleaded as per order dated 09.07.2026 in WPMP.Crl.No.67 of 2026 in WP.Crl.No.1641 of 2025 ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition(Crl.) filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to provide police protection to the petitioner to construct a compound wall in her property located at Survey 429/2A situated at Pullarambakkam Village, Thiruvallur District. For Petitioner : Mr.Pradeep Jayaraman https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.1641 of 2025 For Respondents For R1 to 3 : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER This writ petition has been filed for a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to provide police protection to the petitioner to construct a compound wall in her property located at Survey 429/2A situated at Pullarambakkam Village, Thiruvallur District. 2. Though the petitioner has requested police protection, the same cannot be granted as it is for fencing or putting up compound wall in and around her property. According to the petitioner, the fourth respondent obstructed the petitioner from putting up compound wall in and around her property. In this regard, the petitioner lodged complaint and the same was enquired and closed on 30.12.2025 itself and the petitioner had been directed to approach the civil court. Therefore, the petitioner also approached revenue authorities and even the revenue authorities issued summon to the fourth respondent and he did not appear for enquiry. Thereafter, the land was surveyed and boundary stones were fixed in and around the property owned by the petitioner. At the time of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.1641 of 2025 fencing the property, the fourth respondent obstructed the petitioner from putting up compound wall. 3. In view of the above, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can very well put up fencing in and around her property. However, if any third party is obstructing her from putting up compound wall, the petitioner is at liberty to lodge complaint before the third respondent and on receipt of the same, the third respondent is directed to take appropriate action against the persons who committed offence by registering FIR in accordance with law. 4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 09.07.2026 Index : Yes/No (2/2) Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.1641 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur. 3.The Inspector of Police, Pullarambakkam Police Station, Thiruvallur. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras WP . Crl. No. 1641 of 202 5 09.07.2026 (2/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis