- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39769 WP NO.7747 OF 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.7747 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. M. NARASAPPA REDDY S/O LATE MUTTAPPA @ CHIKKABIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.82, VISMI VILLA, ANUGRAHA LAYOUT, BEHIND SHANTI NIKETHAN SCHOOL, BANNERGHATTA RAOD, BENGALURU - 560 076. PRESENTLY R/AT NO.24, DEVANAGANAM, 3RD FLOOR, EASTERNWOOD LAYOUT, HEGGADANAHALLI, NEAR GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, BENGALURU - 560 087. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. VANITHA DEVI V., ADVOCATE (ABSENT) AND: 1. THE BENGALURU DISTRICT MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-1, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 009. 2. THE TRIBUNAL OF MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 009. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39769 WP NO.7747 OF 2023 3. SRI. N. HEMACHANDRA S/O SRI. M. NARASAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.82, VISMI VILLA ANUGRAHA LAYOUT, BEHIND SHANTI NIKETHAN SCHOOL, BILEKAHALLI, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 076. 4. THE CHAIRMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT TRUST, ITM BUSINESS SCHOOL, BEHIND MEENAKSHI SCHOOL, B.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 076. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. SHANMUGAM YADAV, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET- ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 15TH MARCH, 2023 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN CASE NO.MAG(4)/SC/CR/19/2022-23 BY WHICH THE ORDER DATED 30TH JUNE, 2022 IN CASE MAS(SC)CR/38/2021-22 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 WAS SET-ASIDE VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39769 WP NO.7747 OF 2023 ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. This petition is of the year-2023 and listed for ninth time for non-compliance of office objections. 3. Despite having been granted sufficient time, learned counsel for the petitioner failed to comply with the office objections. This non-compliance by the petitioner would indicate that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7