Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81921 (KAR)

AVNI CHIDRI v. SHRI RAJENDRA C V

CP/403/2025 · 2025-11-14

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46550 CP No. 403 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL PETITION NO.403 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. AVNI CHIDRI D/O. SRI. RAJENDRA.C.V. AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS, REP. BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. KEERTHI.M 2. SMT. KEERTHI.M W/O. SRI. RAJENDRA.C.V, D/O. SRI. N.K.MADHUSUDANA GUPTA R/AT. HOUSE NO 1, N.V.K. APARTMENT, BEHIND TRENDS, TUMKUR ROAD, PAVAGADA-561202. TUMAKURU DISTRICT …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BHARATH.K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SHRI. RAJENDRA.C.V, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O. VENKATARAMANA SHETTY, Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46550 CP No. 403 of 2025 R/AT: NO.75, F1 SWAGATH SPOORTHY, 2ND CROSS, GKW LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560040. …RESPONDENT THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC. 24 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE. 1908., PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND ISSUE AN ORDER TO THE 3RD ADDITIONAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU IN CRL.MISC NO.875/2023 i.e., ANNEXURE -A, BY TRANSFERRING THE SAID CASE TO THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT PAVAGADA TO TRY AND DISPOSE OFF THE SAID MATRIMONIAL CASE FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND GRANT SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46550 CP No. 403 of 2025 ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioners. 2. Office has raised an objection with regard to the prayer, wherein the petitioners have sought for transfer of Criminal Miscellaneous case filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. 3. As such, the present civil petition seeking relief of transfer of said case is not maintainable. 4. Hence, the following: ORDER (i) Petition is dismissed as not maintainable. (ii) However, dismissal of the present petition shall not come in the way of the petitioners filing necessary proceedings before the appropriate Forum. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2