- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43371 WP NO.4213 OF 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.4213 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: BASAVARAJ MALLIKARJUN YERAGAL DEVELOPERS, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.107, NEELA GANGA NILAYA, NEAR ST.PETERS SCHOOL, NAGADEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 056. PRESENT OFFICE ADDRESS AT: NO.212, ARUNACHALAM LAYOUT, KOMMAGATTA, NEAR KENGERI SATELLITE CLUB, BENGALURU - 560 060. REGD. UNDER RERA ACT, 2016. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURENDRA N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, BENGALURU - 560 027. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. PRASAD G. PUROHIT S/O LATE SHANKARAPPA, AGE: MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO.107, Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43371 WP NO.4213 OF 2023 SUVARNAMUKHI, 2ND MAIN, JAGAJYOTHI NAGAR, KENCHANAPURA CROSS, BENGALURU - 560 056. 3. GOUTHAM RAJENDRA MEHTA LANDLORD-1 M/S PRITHWI AND CO. NO.9 AND 10, 3RD FLOOR, SRI. PUTTANNACHETTY COMPLEX, BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BASANAGUDI, BENGLAURU - 560 004. 4. N. BIMAL KUMAR M/S PRITHWI AND CO. NO.9 AND 10, 3RD FLOOR, SRI. PUTTANACHETTY COMPLEX, BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BASANAGUDI, BENGALURU - 560 004. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER TO MODIFY INTEREST PORTION OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ORDER DATED 25TH NOVEMBER, 2022 IN COMPLAINT NO. CMP/220329/0009288 VIDE ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1- KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY; CONSEQUENTLY TO RESTORE THE COMPLAINT NO. CMP/220329/0009288 (ANNEXURE-A) BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO DISPOSE ON MERITS. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43371 WP NO.4213 OF 2023 ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. This petition is of the year-2023 and listed for fifth time for non-compliance of office objection. 3. Despite having been granted sufficient time, learned counsel for the petitioner failed to comply with the office objection. This non-compliance by the petitioner would indicate that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objection. Sd/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5