Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8192 (RAJ)

SOHIB S/O RAJJAK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2660/2025 · 2025-02-27

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8793] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2658/2025 1. Mustkim S/o Majid, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ladduka, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Anvar Khan S/o Abdulla, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ladduka, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2659/2025 1. Rihan S/o Varis, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Lalpur, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Asru S/o Gheesa @ Ginna, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Sablana, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2660/2025 Sohib S/o Rajjak, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Ladduka, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2661/2025 1. Sahil S/o Vahid, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Sablana, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). [2025:RJ-JP:8793] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2658/2025] 2. Jilsad S/o Sahid, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Sablana, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 3. Mohammad S/o Jakir Husain, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Nandera, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 27/02/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.53/2025 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) and 111(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners, the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:8793] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2658/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners, the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, without commenting further anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely 1. Mustkim S/o Majid, 2. Anvar Khan S/o Abdulla, 3. Rihan S/o Varis, 4. Asru S/o Gheesa @ Ginna, 5. Sohib S/o Rajjak, 6. Sahil S/o Vahid, 7. Jilsad S/o Sahid, 8. Mohammad S/o Jakir Husain, in connection with FIR No.53/2025 registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/78-81