- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49507 RFA No. 619 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 619 OF 2008 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. GOUTAM JAIN @ GOUTHAMA CHAND, S/O LATE DALICHAND JAIN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.226, 1ST FLOOR, R.T.STREET BANGALORE- 560 053. 2. SMT. MANJULA DEVI M., W/O. SRI. MITHALAL JAIN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.226, 2ND FLOOR, R.T.STREET, BANGALORE-560 053. 2(a) MISRI BAI W/O. LATE BHURARAMAJI CHOUDWARY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 41/42, 6TH MAIN ROAD, 1ST STAGE, 6TH PHASE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010. 2(b) BHAWARI DEVI W/O. MUKHESH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 365/2, KOTE BEEDI, MADDUR TOWN, MANDYA-571 428. Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49507 RFA No. 619 of 2008 2(c) PRAKASH.B S/O. BHURARAM AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 41/42, 6TH MAIN ROAD, 1ST STAGE, 6TH PHASE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010. 2(d) ANIL KUMAR S/O. BHURRAM AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 41/42, 6TH MAIN ROAD, 1ST STAGE, 6TH PHASE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. GOWTHAM JAIN.,ADVOCATE(ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI S MANGILAL W/O. SESHMAL AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, M/S.MANGILAL, SHANTHILAL, PAWAN BROKERS, SHOP IN GROUND FLOOR, NO.226, R.T.STREET, BANGALORE-560 053. 2. SRI BHURARAM S/O.JITHARAMJI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, SHOP IN GROUND FLOOR, NO.226, R.T.STREET, BANGALORE - 560 053. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAINA VARMA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND LR'S OF R2 ie R2(A-D)) THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF THE CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.01.2008 PASSED IN OS NO. 1288/96 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49507 RFA No. 619 of 2008 AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERPETUAL INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT On account of demise of the counsels for the appellants, Court notice came to be issued. 2. The Court notice returned with an endorsement that the appellant Nos.1 and 2 have left the address, therefore left with no alternative, appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. SD/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11