Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81903 (ALL)

ANISH ALIAS ARVIND v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/26700/2025 · 2025-09-09

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 26700 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Ashutosh Shukla, Sri Ajay Kumar Jagdish, learned counsels for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.124 of 2025, under Sections 87, 137(2) B.N.S., Police Station Sadabad, District Hathras, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The victim is a consenting party. She by her looks seems to be major, although she has stated herself to be minor aged about 15 years. She has expressed her willingness to stay with the applicant only. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has further stated that the victim has refused her medical examination. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 06.03.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Jagdish, Ashutosh Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anish Alias Arvind .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) consideration the fact that the victim seems to be a consenting party, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Anish Alias Arvind, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 10, 2025 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 26700 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad