IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 (1) LPA-965-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 Bijender Kumar ....Appellant Versus Market Committee, Sirsa and others ....Respondents (2) LPA-967-2016 (O&M) Ram Singh ....Appellant Versus Market Committee, Sirsa and others ....Respondents (3) LPA-1683-2016 (O&M) Jai Dev ....Appellant Versus Market Committee, Sirsa and others ....Respondents (4) LPA-1706-2016 (O&M) Hari Singh ....Appellant Versus Market Committee, Sirsa and others ....Respondents (5) LPA-1707-2016 (O&M) Sarwan Kumar ....Appellant Versus Market Committee, Sirsa and others ....Respondents VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.09.12 13:34 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC LPAs No. 965, 967, 1683, 1706, 1707, 1709 and 1720 of 2016 -: 2 :- (6) LPA-1709-2016 (O&M) Jai Dev ....Appellant Versus Market Committee, Sirsa and others ....Respondents (7) LPA-1720-2016 (O&M) Bhim Sain ....Appellant Versus Market Committee, Sirsa and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI ---- Present: Mr. P.K.Chugh, Advocate for the appellant(s). Mr. Vasu Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the respondents have already settled with the similarly situated appellant and the present appellant(s) also intend to approach the respondents for the grant of the same benefit as being extended to the similarly situated appellant by filing a representation and the respondents be directed to decide the same in view of the settlement with the other similarly situated appellant. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent – Market Committee submits VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.09.12 13:34 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC LPAs No. 965, 967, 1683, 1706, 1707, 1709 and 1720 of 2016 -: 3 :- that in case any representation is received at the hands of the appellant(s) so as to grant them the benefit, which has been granted by the Market Committee, Sirsa to the other similarly situated appellant, the said representation will be looked into and in case it is found feasible to grant the same relief to the appellant(s) herein, the same will be granted otherwise, due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting their claim. 3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the present appeals may kindly be disposed having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a representation. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 6. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) September 09, 2025 JUDGE Varinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No VARINDER PRASHAD 2025.09.12 13:34 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC