Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8190 (CAL)

HARIPADA NASKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/2246/2024 · 2025-08-04

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sl.No. 627 Court No. 35 G.S.Das 04.08.2025 WPA 2246 of 2024 Haripada Naskar -Vs- The State of WB & Ors. Ms. Rupsha Chakraborty … for the State respondent(s) Re The petitioner has approached this court being aggrieved by the inaction of the police authorities as, according to him, in T. Ex. 8 of 2017 arising out of T.S. 56 of 2016, no protection was afforded to him. I have considered the prayers advanced by the petitioner and the information was furnished to the police authorities. Having considered that substantial time has passed since the police authorities were earlier approached, I direct that if the petitioner is faced with the same inconveniences, he would file a fresh representation before the concerned Officer-in-charge who will take steps in accordance with law. As none appears on behalf of the State, Ms. Rupsha Chakraborty, learned advocate, who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State, is directed to appear on behalf of the State. Her appearance may be regularized by the concerned authorities. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 2246 of 2024 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)