SRI G KRISHNA REDDY v. SRI R VENKATA REDDY SINCE DEAD BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS SRI SHIVAPPA REDDY
WP/12365/2024 · 2025-07-30
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81892 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81892 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29280 WP No. 12365 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 12365 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI. G.KRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE RAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESIDING AT JIGANI VILLAGE/HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-560 105. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGA REDDY.V., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. 1(a) SRI. R.VENKATA REDDY SINCE DEAD BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS,
SRI. SHIVAPPA REDDY S/O LATE R.VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
1(b) SRI. JAYARAMA REDDY S/O LATE R.VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
1(a) AND 1(b) ARE RESIDING AT GUDDAHATTI VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-560 099. 1(c) SMT. PUSHPAMMA D/O LATE R.VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BENGALURU-560 101. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29280 WP No. 12365 of 2024
1(d) SMT. SOWBHAGYA D/O LATE R.VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 1(c) AND (d) ARE RESIDING AT MULLUR VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, KARMALARAM POST, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU-560 101. 2. SRI. G.GOPAL REDDY S/O LATE RAMA REDDY, MAJOR, RESIDING AT GUDDAHATTI VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-560 099. 3. SRI. NARAYANA REDDY S/O LATE RAMA REDDY, MAJOR, RESIDING AT SEETHANAYAKANAHALLI, LAKKUR-HOBLI, MALUR-TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-560 121. 4. SRI. RAMACHANDRA REDDY S/O LATE RAMA REDDY, MAJOR, RESIDING AT SEETHANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-560 121. 5. 5(a)
SMT. GOWRAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LEGAL HEIRS,
PRAKASH REDDY S/O LATE PUTTA REDDY,
5(b) SRINIVASA REDDY S/O LATE PUTTA REDDY, MAJOR,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29280 WP No. 12365 of 2024
5(a) & 5(b) ARE RESIDING AT SEETHANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-560 121. 5(c). SMT. LALITHAMMA D/O LATE PUTTA REDDY, MAJOR, RESIDING AT BELATHUR VILLAGE, BIDHARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU-43. 6. SRI. C.NAGESH REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKANNAIAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDING AT MULLUR VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, KARMALARAM POST, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU. 7. SRI. K.SUBASH S/O LATE KRISHNA REDDY, MAJOR, RESIDING AT KALLAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPUR HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-560 100. 8. 9. SMT. EERAMMA SINCE DEAD BY
SRI. R.NAGARAJA REDDY S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
10. SRI. R.NARAYANA REDDY S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
11.
CHANDRAKANTHA D/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29280 WP No. 12365 of 2024
RESPONDENTS NO.8 TO 11 ARE RESIDING AT SEETHANAYAKANAHALLI-VILLAGE, LAKKUR-HOBLI, MALUR-TALUK, KOLAR-DISTRICT-560 121. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before Registrar (P & H) on several dates and time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the petition was listed before the Court and time was granted to comply with the office objections. The petition is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29280 WP No. 12365 of 2024
prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and also for non- prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12