IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 242 CWP-25512-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.07.2026 Sushil Kumar and Others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. S.S. Antal and Mr. Manish Dhankar, Advocates for the petitioners Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners were working on contractual basis through Outsourcing Policy dated 06.04.2015, Annexure P-3 for more than 5 years, are entitled to 50% basic pay and dearness allowance on the initial pay scale of regular employee, for which reliance is placed Part-II of the above policy and the judgment of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in State of Punjab and Others vs. Jagjit Singh and Others, (2017) 1 SCC 148 as also the aforesaid policy, which defines the pay scale. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to re- consider the claim of the petitioner within a period of 6 months, taking note of the aforesaid policy and judgment, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the MOHIT 2026.07.22 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-25512-2025 (O&M) -2- benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 21.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.22 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document