IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Hajipur and another Smt. Uttami Devi and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. appellants that appellant No. 2 District Hoshiarpur, was not a party in the proceedings before the Court below i.e. either before the learned trial Court or before the learned Appellate Court defendant No. 112 before the learned trial Court. 2. submits that he may be permitted to withdra with liberty to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, as per law. 3. 4. 5. 27.08.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Hajipur and another Versus Smt. Uttami Devi and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. CL Premy, Ms. Raman Rekhi and Ms. Amarjit Kaur, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. RS Chauhan, Advocate for the LRs of respondents No. 1, 5, 10, 14, 15, 18, 19, 23, 28, 29, 34, 36, 38, 41 & 42 and for respondents No. 2 to 4, 6 to 9, 11 to 13, 16, 17, 21, 22, 24 to 37, 30 to 33, 35, 37 and 40. Mr. PS Kanwar, Advocate for respondents No. 129 to 131. UPTA, J. (ORAL) At the very outset, it is admitted by learned counsel for the appellants that appellant No. 2-Gram Panchayat Mawa, Block Hajipur, District Hoshiarpur, was not a party in the proceedings before the Court either before the learned trial Court or before the learned Appellate Court. It is also pointed out that however, appellant No. 1 was defendant No. 112 before the learned trial Court. In view of the above, learned counsel for the appellants ts that he may be permitted to withdra with liberty to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, as per law. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, 27.08.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4359-2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.08.2025 Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Hajipur and another .… Appellants .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. CL Premy, Ms. Raman Rekhi and Ms. Amarjit Kaur, Advocate for the appellants. for the LRs of respondents No. 1, 5, 10, 14, 15, 18, 19, 23, and for respondents No. 2 to 4, 6 to 9, 11 to 13, 16, 17, 21, 22, 24 Mr. PS Kanwar, Advocate for respondents No. 129 to 131. At the very outset, it is admitted by learned counsel for the Gram Panchayat Mawa, Block Hajipur, District Hoshiarpur, was not a party in the proceedings before the Courts either before the learned trial Court or before the learned Lower . It is also pointed out that however, appellant No. 1 was defendant No. 112 before the learned trial Court. , learned counsel for the appellants ts that he may be permitted to withdraw the present second appeal, with liberty to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, as per law. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No At the very outset, it is admitted by learned counsel for the Gram Panchayat Mawa, Block Hajipur, ower . It is also pointed out that however, appellant No. 1 was , learned counsel for the appellants the present second appeal, RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.29 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.