Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81855 (ALL)

HARDEV SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

WRIB/3003/2025 · 2025-09-15

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3003 of 2025 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. Order in Civil Misc. Amendment Application No. 2 of 2025 Matter is taken up in the revised call. Heard. Amendment Application is allowed. Necessary amendment be carried out during the course of the day. Order in Writ Petition:- Heard Shri R.C. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Rituvendra Singh Nagvanshi, Shri Rituvendra Singh, learned counsels for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The petitioners have made a representation under Section 6 of the U.P. C.H. Act before the respondent No. 2 - Consolidation Commissioner, U.P. Lucknow. The only prayer made on behalf of the petitioners is that their representation may be decided within a stipulated period of time. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the matter requires determination of facts by the competent authority as per law in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Mangal Singh, Rituvendra Singh Nagvanshi, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Hardev Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) the first instance. In light of the submissions made at the Bar and without going into the merits of the case, the respondent No. 2 - Consolidation Commissioner, U.P. Lucknow is directed to decide the representation of the petitioners as per law preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. September 16, 2025 Jaswant WRIB No. 3003 of 2025 2 (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad