Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8183 (CHH)

UMA KANWAR v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER

WPC/818/2025 · 2025-02-07

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:7092 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 818 of 2025 1 Uma Kanwar W/o Shri Karampal Singh Kanwar Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Madawa Dhodha, P.O./block/p.S. Banki Mongra, Tahsil - Katghora, Distt. Korba Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 Chief Election Commissioner Chhattisgarh State Election Commission, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 District Election Officer/ Collector Korba, Distt. Korba Chhattisgarh 3 Registration Officer/ Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Palika Parisad, Banki Mongra, Distt. Korba Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Ravish Verma, Advocate For Respondent(s)/ State : Shri Shreyansh Mehta, P.L. For Respondent No. 1 : Shri Venketesh Pandey, on behalf of Shri R.S. Marhas, Advocate 2 Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 07/02/2025 Heard. 1. The writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs :- “10.1)It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the records pertaining to the petitioner and decision on the application/objection for inclusion of the name of the petitioner in the present voter list and previous voter list of state assembly election held in 2024 to reveal the availability of the petitioner in the said list and for opportunity of voting right and contesting election should be restore. 10.2)It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ of mandamus etc. commanding the respondents to hold the election of ward no. 18, Madawa Dhodha, Nagar Palika Parishad Bankimongra, Tahsil Katghora, Distt. Korba (C.G.) to be held on 11.02.2025. 10.3) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. From perusal of pleadings of the writ petition and the relief clause of the writ petition, it appears that the same has not been properly framed. It is not clear for which constituency or 3 area he is seeking inclusion of his name in the voter list. Even the petitioner has not filed any document in respect to the objection raised/ request made for inclusion of his name in the voter list to the C.G. State Election commission within the time schedule. 3. Since the writ petition is without proper pleading and document, the same is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a duly constituted petition, if so desire. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti