Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8181 (JHR)

Ms Zillion Infra Projects Pvt Ltd Through Its Managing Director Sh Anant Saxena And Anr v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./998/2025 · 2025-05-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:14014 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 998 of 2025 1. M/s Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd., a Company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 having reg office at: 5th Floor, Anushka Shopping Mall Plot No. 2, Garg Trading Centre Sector-11, Rohini, New Delhi-110085, represented through its managing Director Sh. Anant Saxena, S/o late Sh. RK Dundha, aged about 62 years, resident of 5th Floor, Anushka Shopping Mall Plot No. 2, Garg Trading Centre Sector-11, Rohini, New Delhi-110085. Po Rohini, New Delhi-110085, P.O. Rohini, P.S. Prashant Vihar. 2. Anant Saxena, aged about 62 years, son of RK Dundha, resident of 5th Floor, Anushka Shopping Mall Plot No. 2, Garg Trading Centre, Sector-11, Rohini, New Delhi-110085, P.O. Rohini, P.S. Prashant Vihar ...Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand; 2. M/s Fusion Engineering Products Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under companies act, 1956 having its reg. Office at: B-16, Vith Phase P.O Gamharia, P.S. Adityapur, Distt. Saraikela Kharsawan through its Director Finance Mr. Jyotirmayee Ghosh S/o Late Sh. Sk Ghosh, R/o House No. A-4, Elite Residency, Near 9 & 10, Loyola School, Bistupur, P.O. & P.S. Bistupur, Jamshedpur-831001, District - East Singhbhum. …… Opp. Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Agnivesh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, A.P.P. 04/Dated: 09/05/2025 This petition has been filed for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 844 of 2016 in its original file which was dismissed for non prosecution vide order dated 09.04.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the case was not marked, he has not appeared on that day in view of that the said Cr.M.P. No. 844 of 2016 has been dismissed. 3. Learned counsel for the State has got no serious objection if the said petition is restored in its original file. 4. It appears that sufficient cause has been made for restoration. ( 2025:JHHC:14014 ) 5. Accordingly, Cr.M.P. No. 844 of 2016 is restored in its original file. 6. Cr.M.P. No. 998 of 2025 stands allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Satyarthi/