IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (121) CRM-M-38988-2025 (O&M) Decided on :23.07.2025 Ninder Kaur ……Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and others ……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Geeteshwar Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SUMEET GOEL, JUDGE (Oral) 1. The petition in hand has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following substantive prayer(s):- “It is therefore prayed that the present petition may kindly be allowed, direct the official respondents to look into the matter and take appropriate legal action against the private respondents/accused persons in pursuance to the representation dated 26.03.2025 (Annexure P-2) in accordance with law.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime has limited his prayer by stating that he would be satisfied, for the nonce, if a direction is issued to respondent No.3-Senior Superintendent of Police (Rural), Amritsar, to consider and take a conscious decision on the representation dated 26.03.2025 made by the petitioner (copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure P-2 with the petition in hand) in a time-bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Gurpartap S. Bhullar, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4. He has urged that he has no NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.07.23 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh CRM-M-38988-2025 P a g e | 2 objection in case limited prayer made by the petitioner, for decision of his representation dated 26.03.2025 (Annexure P-2), is directed for. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the rival party(s) and upon perusal of the paper-book, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the petition in hand with the following directions: (i) Senior Superintendent of Police (Rural), Amritsar is mandated to look into the representation dated 26.03.2025 (Annexure P-2) moved by the petitioner, objectively consider the grievance(s) raised therein & take ratiocinated decision thereupon within a period of 15 days from today. Said decision be conveyed to the petitioner within 7 days thereafter. (ii) No order as to costs. (SUMEET GOEL) July 23, 2025 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.07.23 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh