- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37887 RSA No. 950 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 950 OF 2022 (RES) BETWEEN: SMT. MALLIKA BEGUM W/O SHAFI MOHAMMED AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BARLINE TUMAKURU TOWN TUMAKURU - 572 101 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. CHETHAN B.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O SRIRANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOUSING BOARD, HIG NO.2, ARALIMARADAPALYA, SIRA GATE TUMAKURU TOWN, TUMAKURU - 572 101 …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.05.2020 PASSED IN RA.No.32/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, TUMAKURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.03.2018 PASSED IN OS No.841/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMAKURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37887 RSA No. 950 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None appears for the appellant. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Order sheet depicts that appellant is not diligent in prosecuting the appeal and this Court sou moto granted time on 19.08.2025 and 30.08.2025 for the appellant to address the arguments on the admission of the appeal. Since learned counsel for the appellant has not addressed the arguments on the admission of the appeal, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50 CT: BHK